Oedipus & Creon, a Great man or a Great Fall? Compare/contrast two characters in Sophocles' Plays and relate them to the great fall of man in Greek society. (Oedipus and Creon)

Sophocles was a great playwright in ancient crownwork of Greece who had written piecey trilogies that were victorious in the City orgy festival. 1 of the most famous myths depicted in these plays would be those of Oedipus and the anathematise on his family. In his play Antigone, Sophocles focuses on Creon?s faults as a character, including his hubris and impatience which leads to his ultimeat down give and causes him to escape those that ar dear to him. In Oedipus the King, Sophocles emphasizes the fallibility of hu human being k nowadaysledge, which is at one time once more due to hubris. Antigone takes place after the deaths of Antigone?s both(prenominal) brothers Eteocles and Polyneices. Creon, who has now been named office, declares that Polyneices is to remain unburied. In his first speech of the play, Creon places overmuch ferocity on the words ? legal philosophy? and ? tenet? thus characterization his belief in government as the supreme authority. Thus, Sophocles establishes Creon?s main argument for upholding his unholy edict. However, his hubris becomes real clear when he st take ins ?I swear I am no man and she the man if she can win this and not pay for it? (Antigone, 484). Here, Sophocles shows that level if Creon debates that Antigone is justified in the actions that she took, he volition refuse to judge her from death because she is a woman, reaffirming the presence of Creon?s hubris. In Oedipus the King, a prestidigitator tells Oedipus that there is a chevy rampant among Thebes because the liquidator of the previous king was not brought to justice. The seer then warns Oedipus and tells him that he is the murderer of his own father and in like manner that he has slept with his mother. Oedipus, the king of Thebes, the great conqueror of the sphinx, refuses to be insulted by a imposture old man, and accuses the seer of being a conspirator. Thus his hubris has caused him to freeze off a holy vaticinator who has knowledge of the forebode, and it has led him to resume! that he is being plot against and about to be overthrown. Because both of these plays were written by Sophocles, umpteen thematic similarities can be drawn, as well as character flaws such as how hubris has driven both Creon and Oedipus to believe that they are being conspired against by some person good to them, (Oedipus intellection it was Creon in Oedipus The King, Creon thought it was Antigone and Ismene in Antigone). In both these plays, Teiresias is the one to read cleared to both characters as they assoil their ate has come about. In Greek tragedy, ate is the preordained give way of an individual by the gods.

In the case of Oedipus, from birth his ate was set in motion, and i t was his hubris that caused it to be revealed to him. However it can be argued that in Antigone, Creon could have prevented his ate had he shown a smallish more humility to the gods, however instead, he let his hubris keep in line his actions which caused him to suffer. Therefore in both of these great Sophoclean plays, the fall of man came about as a result ultimately of a fate preordained by the gods, only the character flaw that helped to bring about this great fall was the hubris of man, either by transgressing spectral boundaries and imposing human law over divine law, or by assuming the idol of human knowledge and defacement of divine knowledge. In both cases, man?s hubris towards matters of the divine brought about his ultimate ruin. whole works Cited1.MacKay, L.A. Antigone, Coriolanus, and Hegel. Transactions and proceedings of the American Philological Association, Vol. 93. (1962), p. 1672.http://www.jstor.org/stable/283759?seq=13.Sophocles I Edited by David Green e and Richmond Lattimore ! If you want to get a full essay, ball club it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay